Every night, they traded places. Remarque evidently portrays Kantorek as a negative character, who forced the protagonist into war and therefore lifelong despair; however, he also creates a new variant of authoritative character for the reader to experience. This way, through the careful analysis it appears to be possible to note the concepts of how the matter of human nature is revealed. The man laughed at him, but Kat just went back out. Again: these dudes aren't psyched about getting a hot bath filled with Mr. Their bet seems callous, but it is ultimately harmless, since they have no actual power over who lives and who dies. The background of the author is what makes him be able to express himself, to allow himself to find his inner self though adding the tone and the personal voice to the story, setting the mood and the atmosphere of events, this is what makes his story authentic and unique.
He does not want to talk to them and scare them on the topic of war. Keegan 3 It was a war in which mechanization lead to insurmountable defensive advantages resulting in a bloody stalemate. I could observe a similar phenomenon in many of my friends and acquaintances. Those microorganisms are living it up. The day he dies, the papers proclaim that all is quiet; Paul's death is not even important enough to mention. Peter Remark, descended from a family that fled to Germany after the French Revolution, earned so little as a bookbinder that the family had to move 11 times between 1898 and 1912. It is the loveliest time of the year now, when the corn ripens; at evening the fields in the sunlight look like mother-of-pearl.
They start out as good people forced into a bad situation, but the experiences forever mar them. Remarque accurately depicts both the physical and mental repercussions of war. He is innocent as he heads off to war with his school friends. He was the first to be hit and his friends had no option but to leave him lying for dead. Publishing Information The publishing information in a book is usually glossed over by readers. They should be helping to nurture life rather than taking it away.
The author states that the battles that the soldiers faced were terrible. Nonetheless, it is more important to understand how the author is doing it and what is the reason for depicting human nature in terms of animal instinct Wood, 90. His descriptive writing portrays the graphic details of reality, leaving the readers of the 20th century in shock. Additionally, the soldiers are forced to live in appalling conditions—in filthy, waterlogged ditches full of rats and decaying corpses and infested with lice. The horror of the war and Remarque's own terrifying experiences and memories would certainly have effected what he wrote. The only way for soldiers to survive is to disconnect themselves from their feelings, suppressing their emotions and accepting the conditions of their lives. Living in this environment, under the constant threat of violent death, took an emotional toll on the young soldiers.
This soldier, Paul Baümer, grapples with death, regret, and the powerful presence and impact of authority figures during the war. More importantly, during the course of this metamorphosis, Baumer disaffiliates himself from those societal icons—parents, elders, school, religion that had been the foundation of his pre-enlistment days. The grainy black and white film is still not outdated and carries a breathtaking initial impact. One would expect the boys to become afraid of sadistic instructors, but instead, they beat him up in the night ch. Even before he dies, Paul knows that life is no longer worth living.
The essence of this mindset is the total disregard for human life, and with it, human beliefs and customs. In training them for war, Himmelstoss inadvertently gave the soldiers a means of rebelling against his tyrannical rule. The United States entered the war late, trying not to get involved with foreign affairs. They look just as kindly as our own peasants in Friesland. Again and again, Remarque would return to scenes of the war and to postwar Germany for subjects of his novels. The entire purpose of this novel is to illustrate the vivid horror and raw nature of war and to change the popular belief that war is an idealistic and romantic character. In this way, the novel acts as a secondary source.
Kropp, who has lost the bet, grudgingly hands over the last beer to the victorious Kat. There is a huge change in these men; at the beginning of the novel they are enthusiastic about going into the war. You can decide if the war being fought is a war of dignity and glory as everyone would make it out to be or if it was a battle of death and gore. Paul, Haie, Kropp, and Tjaden waited for him one dark night when he was coming back from the pub, pulled a bed-cover over his head, pulled his pants down, and beat him with a whip. The story is about how Paul and the other soldiers with him, who are also his closest friends, deal with the many aspects of the war. For us lads of eighteen they ought to have been mediators and guides to the world of work of duty, of , of progress — to the future…The idea of authority, which they represented, was associated in our minds with a greater insight and more humane wisdom.
They exchange far too much of their own possessions only to get one night's meal. A fairly normal person disgusted with the flaws of humanity, for example, may wear the mask of being antisocial to avoid other people. In Erich Maria Remarque 's book All Quiet on the Western Front the ramifications caused by World War I become detrimental to nature. His enemy is modern warfare, not the English or the French. Remarque spends the entire novel trying to point out the evils of an authoritarian rule, but in the process manifests the valuable lessons and Paul and his friends discover in the war.