Sex and violence are primal parts of our genetic make-up and we do not need alcohol to bring them to the surface. The underlying causes are biological and social and abuse would happen anyway, even without alcohol. If you drive while drunk, you go to jail. But I think we were talking about your take on it, not other peoples opinions. So why can government rule to limit people from hurting themselves because of their own behaviour? I do not agree with the solution of banning alcohol to solve the problem, there are many better solutions to solve this matter, such as to increase the price of alcohol, or educate people for the harmful effects of alcohol, etc. A major problem is that most of the alcohol which is produced by non-state enterprises, contains a large amount of toxic substances. Currently a few Islamic countries have the ban imposed, these are Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Iran and the Gaza.
And thus, not every alcohol advertisement is bad. Heated debates have been going on trying to find out the true answer to a major question: Does the legalization of drugs give positive or negative results? Protecting human beings from their own irrationality is another example of these benefits. Let's identify some of the obvious flaws in their case: 1 The proposition believes that the only valid reason for limiting individual freedom is the harm that is done to the 3rd party. Thus most of people prefer convenience rather than feelings from trying something forbidden. .
Everybody can get drunk even in the morning and cause public disturbances. The evidence, of course, was accumulated during the thirteen-year period 1920-1933. May be a feeling of coolness from breaking a law adds a little to the satisfaction from using drugs. It is also true that tax revenues would be lost if alcohol were banned. The prohibition is against personal liberty which will lead to stunted growth of population as they would not be able to make individual choices.
If we can't ban alcohol because of traditions, it doesn't mean that we should allow also drugs. I just voted for its legalization in Arizona for medicinal reasons. Likewise, the consumption of drugs will not change now! You are good I must admit. A society that is free and where individuals are happy is a society where individuals engage more and also give more back to the society. If its more complicated, less people will buy them.
We believe that since there is sound reasoning why alcohol and cigarettes are legal, this should be considered when looking at the case with drugs, because cigarettes and alcohol are also addictive. Well done for not reading my arguments again. Plus it gives you a false sense of happiness. Even though this was a popular amendment in Congress, throughout the 1920's alcohol was still found in almost every bar, club, and restaurant, but the only difference was that this amendment created an environment where criminals could stand to make a profit since alcohol was deemed illegal. This implies that there have been some reasons for such bills passed all over the world. Liquour section in a supermarket.
Now my dear you can make a list of arguments about anything. Yes its fine to have 1 or 2 glasses but what problems it can cause for the idiots who get in a car thinking their fine but can cause a loss of an innocent persons life! Also it is not very clever to ignore the experience of other states such as those that fight with alcohol after it being legal for many years, and the Netherlands that banned hallucinogenic mushrooms. Alcohol also alters the brain functions, causing hallucination, anxiety and other psychological problems among alcohol addicts. The third clash point about the individual freedoms also was closely related with the parallel between drugs and alcohol. That's why I call it the 'corrupt bargains. We cannot debate on this topic because that can be proved only scientifically.
. Let's think about future uncontrolled acts! Perhaps reading the article about the dangers of alcohol, you will stop not only to use this poison yourselves, but also tell it to your friends. Different governments all over the world have made many mistakes and have paid heavily for them! Statewide alcohol prohibition, however, failed like national prohibition. The Netherlands has stepped back in their liberal policy towards drugs. Have you ever thoroughly read any of my arguments before disputing? If people consume alcohol sensibly and responsibly, it will do no harm. A person who wants to buy a drug will buy it and another who is not interested in it will not buy it only because of the discount. Moreover, tolerance is developed soon.
Let's start by recognizing that human beings are quite bad at making decisions. Imagine now the situation after amphetamine, cocaine and heroin are legalized. Despite my personal dislike of alcohol, I still know that it would be unwise for society to try and ban it again. I have known groups of people who smoke pot and yes they are not as productive. Also in our current society anything could happen and be so much worse than it was back in the 20's.
Judgment was passed by the Supreme Court stating that liquor and fundamental rights do not go together. While drinking alcohol may offer some health benefits such as reduce your risk of developing heart disease, ischemic stroke, and possibly diabetes, it can also cause addiction, drunk driving, cirrhosis of the liver, high blood pressure, alcohol poisoning, kidney disease and so on. Therefore a ban would be very ineffective, as the people would do it due to the ease of producing alcohol and the cultural acceptance. The fact is pot affects the brain. The opposition stated that the government knew better than its citizens what is good for them and what is not.
Alcohol is one of the most dangerous drugs and yet it's legal. All content © Copyright 2000 - 2018 Video Indiana, Inc. Then, even Gods indulged in Sura. It's a hazard as well and it impairs judgement to an extreme amount. Drunken drivers remained a frequent menace on the highways.